Realistic Building Collapse by rkfnql322
Fire and Collapse Slow
nuketester
building
whatevs
realisticburn
tower
nukeit
wtc
911
dismustbeart
Comments
-
cyberdragon442 24th Nov 2012
double post error \/ -
rkfnql322 24th Nov 2012
@cj646464 Is that so? Oh, I didn't notice that.. Living in country which has sorrow history makes me sensitive with such a sad history. Anyway thanks for the advice.(Actually I found 911 and WTC tag and added such pharses) -
rkfnql322 24th Nov 2012@cj646464 Is that so? Oh, I didn't notice that.. Living in country which has sorrow history makes me sensitive with such a sad history. Anyway thanks for the advice.(Actually I found 911 and WTC tag and added such pharses)
-
cj646464 24th Nov 2012
He is from a diff. country I think and he thinks its a major part in American history, it was yet not really noticable in this save, and even if it was, its ok. -
Jesusfreak4sure 24th Nov 2012
Oh and it dosent really make me think of 9/11 it would alittl emore if there were two bulidings at identical highth. But great save tho! -
Moonkey 24th Nov 2012
@circovik: For the last time, it is not realistic in physics. It is realistic in TPT's matter. Quit acting like that. -
circovik 24th Nov 2012
@Moonkey Please tell me how this is realistic. I see no realism being demostrated here. A structure relies on every other part to stay standing, disrupting one brings the building to the ground. This stays standing no matter what I take away from it and the fire spread is unrealistic. -
EEL123 24th Nov 2012
Thrm doesn't need firw to be ignited. Normal fire can set it off. -
Moonkey 24th Nov 2012@cyberdragon: Thank TPT for not being realistic. @Circovik: I doubt you have set a tower made out of more wood than metal on fire.
-
cyberdragon442 23rd Nov 2012Get rid of the bomb and just have something to set the buildings on fire. And it doesn't take much so don't blow them up.