rkfnql322
rkfnql322
76 / 15
22nd Nov 2012
23rd Nov 2012
Fire and Collapse Slow
nuketester building whatevs realisticburn tower nukeit wtc 911 dismustbeart

Comments

  • Sailnir
    Sailnir
    23rd Nov 2012
    I like the ship much more than this one. still cool but the ship makes it look bad.
  • cyberdragon442
    cyberdragon442
    23rd Nov 2012
    How is this realistic? It just blows up and melts! -_-
  • Kikinicij
    Kikinicij
    23rd Nov 2012
    Dude, really cool. I love it. Keep it up . +1
  • Uberness
    Uberness
    23rd Nov 2012
    Meh, people shouldn't be reminded of 9/11 just because of buildings in a save.
  • circovik
    circovik
    23rd Nov 2012
    @Moonkey It doesn't simulate fire very well either, it dissipates far too quickly and has very little impact on the building as a whole. IRL fires can endanger the whole structure of a building by weakening the vertical supports due to the heat. Steel loses half its load capacity when heated to 600 degrees C.
  • rkfnql322
    rkfnql322
    23rd Nov 2012
    NWAAAAAA this is not art related with WTC or so...Also this is too weak to use as nuketester!!.. Who tagged?. @hdp maybe you fail lol@Moonkey Thanks!@EEL123 firw work as igniter for thrm(?)
  • tothemyers
    tothemyers
    23rd Nov 2012
    Protip: Put some "FIGH" in there, and a stickman at the top of the big tower and, hey, you've got Al-Queda!
  • Moonkey
    Moonkey
    23rd Nov 2012
    circovik. It's realistic. As in, it collapses to fires and other things. Not "Durr hurr I'll use the eraser tool and erase the bottom". There's realism.
  • hdp
    hdp
    23rd Nov 2012
    it doesnt fall
  • circovik
    circovik
    22nd Nov 2012
    I see no realism here, destroying any part should bring the whole building to the ground. et this doesn't fall down even if the bottom is destroyed completely