The Powder Toy

Why the human eye is not accurate by benmcintosh

benmcintosh
benmcintosh
12 / 9
8th Feb 2014
8th Feb 2014
they just bounce around after you put them in front! Human eyes still work though as you can read this. P.S does anyone want to make a computer for it?
human photon ph0t0n eyes phot0n ph0ton herp werp humannn

Comments

  • The-Thinking-Man
    The-Thinking-Man     9th Feb 2014
    you are joking, right?
  • benmcintosh
    benmcintosh     8th Feb 2014
    i was going to make a diplay for it but couldn't be bothered
  • benmcintosh
    benmcintosh     8th Feb 2014
    I didn't mean for this to be realistic...
  • benmcintosh
    benmcintosh     8th Feb 2014
    How did this get FP?
  • A_guy
    A_guy     8th Feb 2014
    This doesn't support your assumption at all, their only bouncing off becasue of what you made the receptor material to be. Their bouncing off of it when in reality the photons would be absorbed by your rods and cones.
  • Tanawsomeguy55
    Tanawsomeguy55     8th Feb 2014
    and the human eye has a .10 of a second delay which is quite long so our brain makes assumptions on what will happen.
  • G14989
    G14989     8th Feb 2014
    You didint add all the rods and cones
  • G14989
    G14989     8th Feb 2014
    Okay #1 Nature takes care of it, the photon might be translataed into an electronic signal( not bouncing off)
  • blk
    blk     8th Feb 2014
    I tried to create a memory system for it (sometimes i create brains for "organisms") but because this uses INST it is somewhat hard.