atariq344
atariq344
126 / 31
28th Jan 2015
28th Jan 2015
speed of light can change our future
science protons

Comments

  • Demoman200
    Demoman200
    30th Jan 2015
    Wow. Save demonstrating how the speed of light can give us outdated pictures of reality entitled "time travel", a less than fitting name, reaches FP. How does TPT respond? With a mix of religious arguments, incorrect usage of terms, some people who know what they're talking about, but mostly those who don't. :P
  • CozmicKel
    CozmicKel
    29th Jan 2015
    @Nyraion, it is the other way around. Blue light has the shorter wave length. And I am not sure if that is true about colours lighting up different amounts of area unless you are talking about diffraction: blue light is diffracted less, say though a pinhole, which is what causes that rainbow to appear around a light source through something like glass.
  • Yodamort
    Yodamort
    29th Jan 2015
    confusing, pointless but the photons/filter was cool
  • 00yoshi
    00yoshi
    29th Jan 2015
    Telescope its called
  • Nyraion
    Nyraion
    29th Jan 2015
    Nvm about what i said but about light yes but not the electromagnetic spectrum :P
  • Nyraion
    Nyraion
    29th Jan 2015
    @ShadeDrake97 Blue wavelengths are longer red is shorter for instance a red light will illuminate a smaller area because its wavelength is shorter and it loses energy faster and blue will light up more area because of its long weveltength.
  • fuxbert
    fuxbert
    29th Jan 2015
    how the [IIIIII] is this TIMETRAVEL???!!!! and how can this stuff get on fp? lasers and mirrors. whoooooooo!
  • MadisonSilver
    MadisonSilver
    29th Jan 2015
    Nothing new.
  • Death_Silence_66
    Death_Silence_66
    29th Jan 2015
    Guys, please. don't bring religion into powder toy...
  • pkmarci
    pkmarci
    29th Jan 2015
    It means that the "outdated" picture we see was on its way here when the moon was in that form. But even light is not instant, so it is delayed. I never learned this, so I might (and probably is) be wrong.