Technomancer
Technomancer
95 / 5
2nd Aug 2015
3rd Aug 2015
This is an intriguing consequence of Ogsterduck's 'CRAY life' save. If you know what to do with this, please make whatever use of it you can. A more detailed explanation can be found in the save itself.
tptrevolution icantunderstand pseudorandom revolution complicated peculiar

Comments

  • ssccsscc
    ssccsscc
    4th Aug 2015
    if you delete dmnd words pattern changing
  • ogsterduck
    ogsterduck
    4th Aug 2015
    @oldmud0 I can try later.
  • oldmud0
    oldmud0
    4th Aug 2015
    If anyone can come up with a rule table for CRAY "life" for Golly then I will look further into this.
  • dealien
    dealien
    3rd Aug 2015
    Well done! I was contemplating a similar concept with regular LIFE elements, but doing it with CRAY life is an even better idea. There are problems with extraneous data, but I agree that running the simulation backward would help to better understand the outputs for each input.
  • gollark8
    gollark8
    3rd Aug 2015
    For a lot more outputs, just connect lots of them to XOR gates.
  • Kike200
    Kike200
    3rd Aug 2015
    Also, with a lot more outputs it is possible to make a random word machine
  • Kike200
    Kike200
    3rd Aug 2015
    It wasnt so hard right?
  • Kike200
    Kike200
    3rd Aug 2015
    Ill connect the outputs to 1 and 0 in 12ME12's typewriter. and here we have a binary randomizer.
  • Technomancer
    Technomancer
    3rd Aug 2015
    I barely even understand what you just said, never mind actually being able to do it. I'm hoping that one of TPT's resident geniuses might pick this up and run with it.
  • Schmolendevice
    Schmolendevice
    3rd Aug 2015
    One could probably design a function that takes in a set defining the input preconditions and outputs a set of fixed length which very accurately models the behaviour of the automaton then solve for the inverse if possible. If the inverse yields one or more solutions, or none, then so such.