YES! MATE EPIC MAKE A SAVE WITH IT
Interesting... further experiments involving three-pixel MERC chambers showed almost even distribution- in fact, any bias in the randomizing was away from the center rather than towards it. We need to do more SCIENCE
Yes. Please add source id link and update to match mine. the fixes I made are critical to good chart data.
Add the source: id:1476438
I never did like MERC neurons.
Also, in MERC chambers of more than two pixels, the MERC is biased towards the center. This effect greatly overpowers any effect of MERC "freezing". In a 3 pixel chamber, experiments showed that if the middle pixel was the one the MERC needed to be in to conduct, there was not a 33% chance but a 45.5% chance of sparking.
I have disproved the notion of MERC neurons as they exist today. I made a randomizer involving one merc pixel and two pixels of space. The hypothesis was that when electricity flowed through the merc, it would freeze in place (sprk does not move) and be more likely to be in the right place to conduct later on. Howver, experiment showed that the sprk had a 49% chance of getting through, almost exactly 50-50. This is because even if the output didn't get sparked, the MERC still froze in place.
I have updated the pulse gen and changed that circuit in mine now so update when ready.
there is a problem. I need to update mine so you should update this. I am moving the connection for the histo chart to the REF instead of CLK
here is the original with a randomizer in it id:1476438