A lot of the things you hear sbout the T-34 being a amazing tank is propaganda. It is a decent tank, but with several major flaws such as not having a turret basket, which means the floor of the turret moves along with the rest of the turret so crew does not need to continuosly change positions.
And also, German troops were most likely less skilled than the Russian troops, Hitler was an idiot, his military was crap, and he had no financial or ecinomica abilities
if the Germans had engineering capabilities, they could have had some good stuff, they couldn't invent or produce good stuff, the rRussians were smart, they knew about engineering, and they had the ecinomical ability to mass produce their tanks.
Woah this blew up which is nice to see :)
And Soviet tanks were mass produced, and also was capable of "neutralizing" german tanks. even though most of the crews were conscripts, which means they are not skilled. Also, at late war, Soviet tank division was well formed, including JS-2 and T-34-85. As it always did, few superweapons dont win the war, but well-balanced mass produced wins. u can search about german super heavies on wiki, and if i am wrong, let me know. @hdp @railgunnuke
the truth about german "super-heavy tanks" were that the reich failed to manufacture them in large quant actually in case of maus, only 2 has produced; and E-100; only one without turret. and latte does not exists, at all.
@RailgunNuke the only thing wrong with that statement is the fact that Germany had the best armour, Russia just made stuff to counter them. The only thing Russia couldnt counter is things like E-100, Maus, and P.100 Ratte. Those tanks are pretty much impossible to beat until after the war when they found the blueprints.
The only reason it is inaccurate is that he just copied the tanks and put them on sand,rock and dust. It is still a good save... but I dont think it should be on FP.
yeah, no German weapons could even scratch them
isnt that cuz the russian tanks had really good armor plating?