INSL burns. but yes if you put it in a ship its up to you to armor it.
it melts at the slightest touch, and deosnt like ambient heat, but i could never do this so +1
Okay. I made own deut engine (5-10 mins, velocity output is not very stable (like in your engine))
Okay well I'll look into it. And thanks *blushes*
I just picked 100 and 200 as an arbitrary value. what ever works as long as it is consistant. or pressure 10 pix from choke 30 and 50. and WOW! you are awesome.
I should probably move this to a PM... whoops.
Phew... lemme take a breath. Okay and for the cherry on top here is my attempt ata deuterium engine. Everyone, I introduce the DX-100. id:2018967 Special thanks to MrLizard over here.
So we could take a part measurement (minus components that don't contribute to the reaction/engine) then divide the px/frame*pressure at nozzle (or perhaps just pressure at nozzle) by the parts to get a value which can relate size to power. Called the Lz.
I'd like to suggest that in order to make measurements fair, accurate and reliable we devise a standardised pressure tester, which we can place at increments of 0 (nozzle or just out from the choke), 20 and 40. Or we use the Lz as a measure similar to kW/tonne, that scales with the size of the engine.
The results are in @SandwichLizard with the before stated set of rules, I measured the average pressures at x=307, 407, and 507. You result: 647.03 Lz. I'd like to point out that the pressure dropped off significantly at 407 and 507 due to the way that TPT maps pressure, and also that the pressures at these distances were'nt stable. Your nozzle value fluctuated from about 90 to 300 pressure, so I took 3 measures at 3 random time per point then averaged them out.