The Powder Toy

Smallest Computer Ever by NoVIcE

NoVIcE
NoVIcE
316 / 4
1st Aug 2017
4th Sep 2024
This *was* the smallest in august 2017, 65*98px. Smaller cpus exist now. You can call it, half-subframe due the fact that it uses some tricks like particle order to make it small, its not operating on 60hz though (with def. fps cap). More in forum thread
computer programable electronic electronics microcomputer processor small spark smallest novice

Comments

  • DUC
    DUC     17th Sep 2017
    NoVIcE: And BTW this is the greatest save ever :)
  • trettiofem
    trettiofem     17th Sep 2017
    How did you make the computer print "fibonacci seq"?
  • NoVIcE
    NoVIcE     16th Sep 2017
    I dont worry, dont worry. :) I just havent protected it from wrong programming.
  • DUC
    DUC     16th Sep 2017
    NoVIcE: don't bother. Just something interesting I discovered. No need to worry about it.
  • NoVIcE
    NoVIcE     16th Sep 2017
    @DUC, from what i see, your program is that: IN 31 ~ SREG 1 ~ IN 3 ~ SREG 2 ~ SRAM 66049 (ERROR) ~ IN 262175 (ERROR) ~ SREG 3 ~ (169) 769 (ERROR) ~ LREG 1 ~ DISP ~ HALT. ~ is separator. Well, im not surprised, you wrote just nonsense. If this was a joke ok, however if it wasnt, and you want meto fix it, i can help you :)
  • DUC
    DUC     16th Sep 2017
    NoVIcE: I wrote a virus that killed the computer! id:2186275
  • NoVIcE
    NoVIcE     12th Sep 2017
    **Updated ALU, its a bit faster now**
  • NoVIcE
    NoVIcE     8th Sep 2017
    **Fixing my error** - So to make it a 29-bit computer, i could make it a little bigger....
  • NoVIcE
    NoVIcE     8th Sep 2017
    Well, thats an 8-bit computer for ya :). Actually its compatible with 29-bits, but the ALU and instruction ROM decoder are made specifically to read and allow (and process) 8-bit numbers. So with a i could make it a little bigger, but then the **whole** computer should be redesigned entirely. Thats because of the fact that spark is propagated mostly by CRAY, diagonally. It becomes a mess of soup of metals :)
  • SpencerS145
    SpencerS145     8th Sep 2017
    Seems like the fibbonachi sequence overflows at 255, the 8-bit integer limit. Not suprising, but I had expected it to go at least until 999.