DUC
DUC
161 / 7
2nd Aug 2017
12th Dec 2017
Generates a large random number at a rate of 2 numbers per frame. Just spark the green button!
largest subframe writer electronics fast number display spark biggest

Comments

  • jeffluo35
    jeffluo35
    9th Aug 2017
    definitely not fastest if i made a faster one
  • Oizzz
    Oizzz
    8th Aug 2017
    why does it make a checker pattern when you press 5?
  • DUC
    DUC
    8th Aug 2017
    I know it's only pseudorandom. I just say "random" because that's the best a computer can do, and I'm lazy to type. :D
  • CatArmour
    CatArmour
    8th Aug 2017
    so 1+1=2 every time. (not 487353.)
  • CatArmour
    CatArmour
    8th Aug 2017
    @Lars123 but physics follows rules so by even observing the output it is biased. and also if physics follos rules, you can know the output of the reaction. meaning it is not random either.
  • Lars123
    Lars123
    7th Aug 2017
    You lie! This is not random, it is created by a computer and is therefore pseudorandom at best! For a true random number generator, do the following: Rely on an physical process directly dependent on quantum mechanics. Unless TPT uses such a process (which I highly doubt), this is not random. -- +1 for putting up with me. Oh, and also great job for getting anything to print this fast.
  • gunpowderTR
    gunpowderTR
    7th Aug 2017
    in 5 frames your rng generates a number which is 10 digits large but the subframe 29 bit ones generate 25 digit random numbers
  • gunpowderTR
    gunpowderTR
    7th Aug 2017
    @DUC may i ask if you even read @QuanTech's comment? And do you know how numbers work in computation? If we take digits as numbers here your rng generates 2 digits and the 29 bit subframe rngs generate 5 digits per frame(if every digit is from 0 to 9).
  • kevin-the-elder
    kevin-the-elder
    7th Aug 2017
    hey~~~
  • DUC
    DUC
    7th Aug 2017
    gunpowderTR: I've seen those. They generate more digits per frame, but they still produce 1 number per frame. And that's inside FILT. This one actually displays the number. With FILT, subframe becomes easy. But when dealing with DRAY and WIFI and GLOW... anyway I'm not trying to boast, just FYI.