ARDOer
12th Apr 2018
25th May 2019
That bunker can able to withstand the explosion of deut(life=999999999999) bomb. It completely destroyable but this is too difficult to achive. I dont use unbreakable material because its not interesting
bunker
nuclear
stable
bomb
deut
destroyable
realistic
nuke
powerful
destroy
Comments
-
Day, how could an arch of material possibly be cheaper than a straight line? Geometry dictates that an arch shape is longer in total distance than a straight line, so the arches would have to cost more, as there is more material that would have to be built.
-
@dayday24 NEEERRRRDD!
-
SING bomb burns everything, not testing azure but cool +1
-
This bunker is very poorly contructed, what a waste of resources to have to reinforce the cieling with a flat roof! That Flat roof is bluntly taking all the weight of the rock above it, which makes it much more vulnerable to concussive impact. When making any directly load bearing roof, always make it an arch, so the downwards force is ditributed outwards in a more manageable way; Making the structure stronger, cheaper and more spacious.
-
The bunker itself is not stable at all
-
Nice Work I can melt stone... not bunker!+1
-
Why do the tree leaves have deco...?
-
Nice, survived supernova explosion
-
two gigantic neut/deut bombs can destroy half of the bunker
-
took a while to pull it up but one of my older nukes i thought was trash went through like its butter yet my newest and best bombs couldent make it 1+