Seen with a HC-01 supporting. The next generation in MBT design, featuring a hull only setup with armour angled for excellent deflection. The tank has a very low profile and can take a beating. Give me suggestions for more tanks or stuff in general :)
tank
engine
explosive
realistic
explosion
bunker
power
explode
Comments
-
@Gnaeus, please do tell me how it's impractical I'd like the suggestions bud, then maybe I'll change your mind :P
-
Okay found it. Swedish MBT, Strv 103, similar hull design with no turret. It is an Main Battle Tank, not a TD. Stopped being used in 1997, but was quite effective and well used. Give it a google, it's cool
-
When a real life (Chally, Abrams, Merkava) tank is engaged, it is FRONT TOWARDS ENEMY at all times. Therefore a design like this can sacrifice so rear and flank protection, because it has this in the form of other vehicles and infantry. Just because it's called a Tank Destroyer doesn't mean it is one. But I understand and respect your point :)
-
I know, IRL, SVT (or whatever it's called, Swedish tank) ISN'T an MBT, its a TD, totally agree. Howver. Modern MBTs have weak side and rear armour so must be protected from the flanks by IFVs and support vehicles (as seen) along with infantry. It will NEVER have unprotected tanks, unless run by Middle Eastern crews :P
-
i know, i suck because its just a save... but not gonna lie, how on earth did you think that is a MBT? please correct me if im wrong and btw +1... for detail i guess?
-
its a tank destroyer for crying out loud! do you know why militaries dont set up TDs as MBTs? because normally the enemy flanks its targets from behind. especially where most of these militarium are going. also if you say this destroyer is fast then you should really monitor those frontal and back skirting because if it needs to get up a hill thats steep, itll be problematic.
-
who would win-one tanky boi, or some sharp bois
-
Impractical Design. Change my mind... Still love tanks tho
-
one tankey boi +1