LBPHacker
LBPHacker
118 / 0
1st May
3rd May
I made a computer again. It can do a lot of stuff the previous one couldn't and can do most stuff that I'd ever wanted a TPT computer to do. It definitely can churn out Fibonacci numbers and primes. Check the relevant forum thread too.
subframe processor technology mandelbrot dayofweek fibonacci prime r316 computer magic

Comments

  • LBPHacker
    LBPHacker
    8th May
    I've made peripherals that break out INST inputs and outputs, see the bits and pieces save for an example of one and consult the manual on how to get one to work.
  • Likes_anime
    Likes_anime
    8th May
    as in make one that is compatible with the rw version of the thingy in this save of mine id:3206480 read and write plz
  • Likes_anime
    Likes_anime
    8th May
    as in 1 sec
  • LBPHacker
    LBPHacker
    8th May
    What does that mean?
  • Likes_anime
    Likes_anime
    8th May
    make one with io
  • deathhawk
    deathhawk
    8th May
    but can it run linux?
  • LBPHacker
    LBPHacker
    8th May
    You do you >_>
  • @LBPHacker I could use a config file or a command propmpt for the C compiler to choose what machine to compile the code for like what you can do in cc65 and as I said before, ill probably use a modified C compiler for 65x because I think I know too much about 65x and 65x compilers...
  • LBPHacker
    LBPHacker
    8th May
    Maybe lol, depends on how much free time I can allocate to this. I've had a C compiler for my previous computer in my TODOs for a while too. Anyway, don't bother targeting tptasm, the instruction syntax is different for every backend (target architecture), it's only the macro/pragma syntax that's shared. You're better off emitting machine code directly.
  • @LBPHacker Are there any plans to create a high level language compiler such as C for TPTASM? If there arent any, thats fine because I can just make a modified Z80 or 65x compiler myself because their syntax are similar to TPASM.