thespazz
thespazz
46 / 10
23rd Jan 2012
5th Apr 2019
If you see something not working or you just dislike something Tell me and I'll see if can fix it I will not hold anything anenst you because of your opinion.
artfull

Comments

  • cj646464
    cj646464
    23rd Nov 2012
    It was over 50 pounds. Two men had to operate it. It was a tankbuster.
  • thespazz
    thespazz
    23rd Nov 2012
    tigers had over a foot+slant of steel in the front and i think 6in of armor at the sides, not evin a shermin(worst tank ever, it had a 40mm cannon and the tiger had a 70-80mm) can do head on conflict with it. a 60cel round is not much biger then a 50cal and thay did not have the tech to add a modern 50cal in a hand held gun at the time. it whas in the 60-70 when we got the first full powerd 50cal rifle.
  • cj646464
    cj646464
    22nd Nov 2012
    The gun looked sort of like this one except the clip went in on top and there was a peep sight on the side.
  • cj646464
    cj646464
    22nd Nov 2012
    Not back then. This was shoulder fired at Tigers. Thats why armor is so thick now, even though 60 cal rounds can still penetrate it.
  • thespazz
    thespazz
    22nd Nov 2012
    ty man, i thot thay used 65mm not 65 call, 65 call would be small for a tank gun.
  • cj646464
    cj646464
    22nd Nov 2012
    This is turnig out nice btw. It looks like one of those huge 65 cal tank guns they used in WW2
  • thespazz
    thespazz
    22nd Nov 2012
    lol .
  • cj646464
    cj646464
    22nd Nov 2012
    Top of most recent. He said this gun sucked so he made his own.
  • thespazz
    thespazz
    22nd Nov 2012
    look up @Gshark2?
  • cj646464
    cj646464
    22nd Nov 2012
    Ok, this sucks GSHARK2. thespazz, look up.