jacob1
29th Sep 2012
16th Mar 2014
Post any bugs you find here. But there aren't as many bugs that are really bugs and I don't already know about than when this first started, so also use this as a general conversation save, or to ask / tell me anything. #1 most commented save in tpt!
jacob1
problems
bugreport
glitch
fix
960847
tptpp
glitches
bugs
tptplusplus
Comments
-
flubber5: Because you usually can't see the decoration layer when in the save 'browser' menu, unless it's LCRY.
-
What is the advantage of using LCRY anyways? why not just deco some wood?
-
"You have destroyed so much. What is it, exactly, that you have created? Can you name even one thing? I thought not." - Dr. Breen
-
jacob1: Couldn't you manually demote it though...? Wait, that was a stupid question; Nevermind. Wait, no no nonono don't send thi-
-
youtu.be/6PX-6oDPsuU
-
explosivepowder: it wouldn't be demoted because it doesn't have enough LCRY. Also, using layering to avoid the check would be evil ):, and i'd have to make the LCRY checks more strict!
-
Anyhow, away from joking around, If ID:1909481 were published and made its way to FP, would it be demoted? Because than that would be an unneeded demotion - It has a use: The magnatar, it's an interesting firework maker that also destroys things around it over time. Even than, Being part of a roleplay would give it ANOTHER use.
-
Jacob1: How I think people might break your code: layering, Layering 3 layers of sand below 1 layer of lcry AND having a logo making it below 25% LCRY would probably do the trick :D ART MAKERS REJOICE! I HAVE MADE YOUR MESSIAH!!! :D (:P)
-
PortalPlayer: that would work
-
jacob1: just realised that yeah, you wouldn't be able to tell powder that had already been "sandified", decorated otherwise or plain. Though you could surely just affect undecorated powder?