zc00gii
I think your the only one thinking it is a terrible idea. You almost have the opposite look on what TPT aims to be.

zc00gii
Again, you're the only one thinking it's a terrible idea.

I would try that. But, I just started coding as soon as I made that fuse a while ago. It failed but it was an attempt.

pilojo
I don't think it's a good idea either.

It's defined too much by the code. What if I wanted to create a tree with a different slant? Or a taller one? What happens if the seed is in both sand and dust? All the elements we have right now are non-living - adding a tree wouldn't make it a particle simulator anymore.

However, I do think that everyone has their own idea of what TPT aims to be. This is an open-source project. Anyone can modify it - so everyone can have their own idea. For example, Ubuntu (which has user-friendliness in mind) was branched off of Debian (which has stability in mind).

I think it is a bad Idea as well, and reference bchandark's elegantly written response as my reasons.

Hahahahaha you owned them ark XD

yah totly lol xD

My point was that the elements do not act in the way their living counterparts do. Does plant spontaneously appear the moment water touches it in real life? Does wood form out into branches when water is added in TPT? All that wood does is burn, which dead wood does. There is no concept of "life" in TPT, except for stickman, which is an exception, and doesn't really have anything to do with "life" except dying and regenerating health when plant is eaten. Even those are not replicas of real life.