Hard to code, no I don't think so so much, I agree with Felix (how he acts does not change that he is correct in this thread). I think it would be more work to type that stuff out than to actually think about coding the logic of it.
On that note I think we should just focus on more stuff for neutrons :p
Felix Why do you keep complaining about people saying things about the code? Does it bother you that much?
It does, since it makes the readers of suggestion threads to think about the suggestion as stupid, easy to do, hard to do, impossible, won't happen, when the suggestion could be really good.
Spreading misinformation is never good.
triclops200:
Felix Shut up. I am tired of you sitting there saying "you don't know the code" or "It won't be hard." You...Are...Not...The...Judge. Should I say it slower? Stop trolling and stop trying to play creator.
Play creator? "I am tired of you sitting there saying "you don't know the code" or "It won't be hard."" So you are tired of someone saying that an idea would be easy to implement? Good, I am too. So we share opinions about that.
I have never said anything about now knowing the code.
Shut up? I thought this was a discussion forum. Since you are moderator you could just edit my post and remove the part you think bad of. Or perhaps fail merge two of my posts like you have done in the past?
I suggest you to go and look up the word trolling.
Main problem I can see from my limited programming point is LRBD would change into RBDM would change back into LRDB constantly repeating and basically not being of much use