WIFI channels

  • BudCharles
    30th Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @mniip (View Post)
    I think that's a good idea.
  • mniip
    30th Apr 2011 Developer 0 Permalink
    Oh and what about -273..-200 ?
    -273..-200=aa1
    -200..-100=aa2
    -100..0=aa3
    0..100=aa4
    100..200=aa5
    ...
    ...
  • JH-Darkfire
    30th Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    We need a channel tool, but do we need 65000 channels?
  • mniip
    30th Apr 2011 Developer 0 Permalink
    @JH-Darkfire (View Post)
    U know....
    I...
    just...
    want..
    to make....
    T...Tet...Tetris!
    (i need about 700 chnls)
  • edza101
    30th Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    Yeah it's true more channels more complicated games and circuits!!
  • JH-Darkfire
    30th Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    I know what you're saying but 65000?
  • The-Con
    30th Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    If you only have one output, you can easily use portal. I have often needed more channels, but multiple outputs, so portal doesn't work.
    I don't like using the console to set the temp of wifi, because I need to either remember the coordinates, or the particle number.
    I like the idea of a tool that could make it easier.
  • tian110796
    30th Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    The number of effective channels is less than 117,504 (max. particles divided by 2)

    But I think no one would ever reach 5000 channels in a save.
  • The-Con
    30th Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @tian110796 (View Post)
    It depends on the future of TPT.
    one day, when computers are super fast, TPT screen could be increased greatly and could allow for extremely complicated saves.
  • mniip
    30th Apr 2011 Developer 0 Permalink
    One day the screen resolotion will reach 80 000*60 000