shay
21st Jan 2014
25th Jan 2014
still does all the stuff of the mk1, just is faster.
memory
wifi
wrom
parallelserial
Comments
-
@Paul You're right, everyone who says this isn't innovative doesn't know what half of the scanners really does.
-
Shut up, JoshinatorKy. This is one of the most innovative electronic devices recently. So go stand on a cliff over a lake, get hit by a bus, and go careening into the lake.
-
because the scanner and reader get between 2 and 2.5 time larger for every extra pixel you compress into a space. (it adds 2 columns and doubles the rows)
-
by 'bigger' do you mean higher compression rate, or physically larger?
-
@JoshinatorKy: then you'll love the save I'm working on... ;)
-
i wish the data storage is bigger.
-
I'm convinced that originality is all but entirely dead in the TPT community. It saddens me greatly.
-
oh look it's this again. Wonderful, because we need more scanners.
-
Heres a tip to the developer: Instead of using NSCN for retracting the scanner piston, just use the plain INWR, which by itself is faster for retract! Will save a few miliseconds for sure!
-
here: id:1444933