shay
shay
35 / 7
21st Jan 2014
25th Jan 2014
still does all the stuff of the mk1, just is faster.
memory wifi wrom parallelserial

Comments

  • mr-nobody
    mr-nobody
    31st Jan 2014
    @Paul You're right, everyone who says this isn't innovative doesn't know what half of the scanners really does.
  • Paul99
    Paul99
    28th Jan 2014
    Shut up, JoshinatorKy. This is one of the most innovative electronic devices recently. So go stand on a cliff over a lake, get hit by a bus, and go careening into the lake.
  • shay
    shay
    28th Jan 2014
    because the scanner and reader get between 2 and 2.5 time larger for every extra pixel you compress into a space. (it adds 2 columns and doubles the rows)
  • shay
    shay
    28th Jan 2014
    by 'bigger' do you mean higher compression rate, or physically larger?
  • Darkn1883r
    Darkn1883r
    28th Jan 2014
    @JoshinatorKy: then you'll love the save I'm working on... ;)
  • h4zardz1
    h4zardz1
    28th Jan 2014
    i wish the data storage is bigger.
  • JoshinatorKy
    JoshinatorKy
    28th Jan 2014
    I'm convinced that originality is all but entirely dead in the TPT community. It saddens me greatly.
  • JoshinatorKy
    JoshinatorKy
    28th Jan 2014
    oh look it's this again. Wonderful, because we need more scanners.
  • Masterchef365
    Masterchef365
    28th Jan 2014
    Heres a tip to the developer: Instead of using NSCN for retracting the scanner piston, just use the plain INWR, which by itself is faster for retract! Will save a few miliseconds for sure!
  • jklujm
    jklujm
    27th Jan 2014
    here: id:1444933