FuriousWeasel
FuriousWeasel
54 / 2
17th Aug 2015
18th Sep 2016
You can use it, credit is optional. The maximum it can count to is: 268435455. The lazer is from mniip's save; id:1726491
counter 32bit electronic sprk 60hz witchcraft filt

Comments

  • RatRating
    RatRating
    23rd Aug 2017
    @FuriousWeasel cool ^_^
  • FuriousWeasel
    FuriousWeasel
    21st Aug 2016
    @xboy13103: Here, I seperated the lightsaber part of it from the rest of it. :) id:2030703
  • RatRating
    RatRating
    20th Aug 2016
    id:2030525
  • RatRating
    RatRating
    20th Aug 2016
    look at what i did with it! :D
  • Kostia4381
    Kostia4381
    19th Jun 2016
    Reverse halflife curve, as expected. (No pun intended, scientific term.)
  • FuriousWeasel
    FuriousWeasel
    28th Nov 2015
    was fixed a while ago id:1869058
  • Schmolendevice
    Schmolendevice
    22nd Aug 2015
    From my findings, if you 'do it right' and 'load in a new address right,' this counter does in fact support all 28 bits. I've done tests between my alternate yet similar design and your own and each was successful at incrementing in these conditions to eventually reset the counter, lest I haven't done some other ctype tests that would prove me wrong.
  • Schmolendevice
    Schmolendevice
    21st Aug 2015
    Expect me to eventually publish a response scene using my own variation on the compact counting logic. Also, a general convention of mine is to also set the tmp of DTEC so that those interested can easily identify a DTEC's function or radius.
  • Schmolendevice
    Schmolendevice
    21st Aug 2015
    Well, after taking some time to 'derive' the designs for a compact FILT counter on TPT I managed to figure out quite very much how your design works. I had some hopes for coming up with a way to propagate the result with only 1 or 2 BRAYs but probably your setup is the most effective. But overall the solution is still built on the fundamental principles of how synchronous counters work. But indeed, 1 pixel per bit is a good achievement.
  • FuriousWeasel
    FuriousWeasel
    21st Aug 2015
    @Travis_Steele: if a lack of a photon represents a 0 and a photon represents a 1; The pattern created is the same pattern you'd get if layed side by side every number from 0 to 268435455 in binary in order.