Original by 12Me21. still a WIP. Can you make it better? faster? record particle type and x,y coordinate into FILT? lets see where this can go.
alotfaster
couldusesubframe
twceasfast
twiceasfast
justabitfaster
Comments
-
As many of those as possible. It'd merely connect to a readout, no automation. It'd also be ship-mounted, so I would not like DMND/WALLs or huge bits of tech. It needs to be compact but efficient. I'd say some DTEC with ELEC/PHOT and PROT emitters. I would like to see what this becomes.
-
thank you my friend. do you want to detect the presence of an object, its distance, or its composition?
-
NEUT disperses too easily, and PHOT is good but may be difficult to disperse effectively. My desired setup would be a particle emitter or two and detectors that emit sparks to a readout. I could do it, but you could make it awesome.
-
Hey Samdwich, congrats on not dying/getting maimed. It really brings me joy that you can still bring wonder to the Powder Toy. Could you look into a sensor assembly for me? I was thinking it would emit particles and detect reflections, like radar but with PROT/ELEC/etc. PROT would be good for analysing enemy armor, and ELEC's dispersal pattern is regular enough to be functional as a sensor.
-
actually pstn itself does not take 8 frames it is the conductor setup. pstn extends in 1 frame and retracts in 1 frame.
-
+Wigglebot yeah... the PSTN takes 8 frames to push 1 px, so subframe PSTN would be 8x faster!
-
I am trying to see if a subframe version of this machine will work. also, congrats on the surgery :)
-
so glad the operation did go well :) people like you dont deserve to end up badly
-
Aanndd... this is why Sandwichlizard is the one to go to if you need complex circuits that very few people can understand. I'm still trying to figure out how to make a self propelled object with PSTN without copying one of Sandwichlizard's
-
thanks man.