TheNik
TheNik
93 / 13
22nd Jan 2017
22nd Jan 2017
The VRSG fuel lasts as long as COAL, but burns > 59% hotter, meaning it generates that much more energy, and thus making it that much more efficient than COAL. The only major drawback is that handling VRSG is extremely difficult and dangerous. Enjoy!
fire efficient science fuel efficiency comparison virus coal burn compare

Comments

  • Builderbob101
    Builderbob101
    21st October
    what about a chemical that equally expands
  • Builderbob101
    Builderbob101
    21st October
    it failed
  • Builderbob101
    Builderbob101
    21st October
    it's possible to contain it with pushing gravity pumps
  • Hobgoblin
    Hobgoblin
    28th Aug 2023
    an excellent way to turn everything into fire
  • kubolo
    kubolo
    13th Aug 2018
    This is very cheap but unstable fuel! You put some vrsg in tank and you just have to add some trash sometimes.
  • superbroman
    superbroman
    9th Apr 2018
    ikr it lasts s00000 long
  • NovaStar
    NovaStar
    26th Sep 2017
    Itdoesn't last as long though.
  • TheNik
    TheNik
    23rd Jul 2017
    I totally agree, it is nearly impossible to contain VRSG fuel. It would be a nice challenge to create an indestructible-material-free tank for it. I may give it a try one day.
  • TheScienceKid
    TheScienceKid
    6th Jun 2017
    @nick445882 but, you can make walls with soap in the midd- wait that would destroy the VRSG, NERVERMIND
  • LetsGoToSpace
    LetsGoToSpace
    28th Apr 2017
    But in larger amounts the VRSG isnt that godd anymore compared to COAL.