...Alpha, Beta and Gamma Rays
science
Comments
-
w a t a m i d o i n g
-
i t s 3 : 4 6 A M
-
You're right and wrong. Gamma rays are no more or less 'quantum' than any other form of energy, they are just light of a colour which we can't see and which shines straight through most materials. Neither ELEC nor PHOT represent them well, PROT or zero-tmp GRVT would work better.
-
I would describe Gamma Rays as 'Quantum energy'. It must have a mass, because E=MC^2 but it behaves wave-like only. So the Young-Experiment wouldn't work with Gamma-Rays. It has only a practical reason that i used electrons for the Gamma-Rays. It's easier to form a wave with electrons than with photons.
-
Yeah gamma rays are still photons. You even say electromagnetic, which means exactly that. Why do you use electrons to represent it?
-
hapymetal your right
-
well, keeo up tye good work.
-
From the metal being "excited" or something, i cant remind myself how exactly xray generator works, but xray radiation is light, just higher frquency, gamma rays are even higher. Light is photons.
-
@Heyman: Yeah, i'm actually little short on time. @NoVIcE: Here we're again... is it a wave or a particle... For Example: In a X-Ray tube, a target-material is 'bombarded' with electrons, the decelerated electrons are emitting the energy... where should photons come from here?
-
Gamma rays should be phot. Because electromagnetic energy is, light, photons. I thought you can protect from gamma rays with 1m of dirt, concrete and lead or something? You cant stop it but you can lower the amount to a billionth for example.