@DERLAURIS tptmp? Yeah, but I don't use it. It's not very subframe friendly, as you might imagine. If you want to learn more about subframe, there are a couple of saves and forum posts scattered around (FuriousWeasel collected some of them in id:2200079). <small>Or you can join the new, totally active subframe IRC channel at #powder-subframe!</small>
@mark2222: Nice! I was taking more or less the same approach but was too dumb to hack around the odd "rotation" as you put it.
@Draco712 No, single-frame address seeking is impossible for any stacked architecture simply because of how pmap/photons works. However, I would imagine that, if anyone is up for the tedium, a linear-time hard drive could still be useful in computing when combined with a RAM cache. Practically, though, that'd probably have to be divided into "sectors" of ~1000 photons each, which is under the EHOL-FILT limit anyway so a save-and-reload-anytime hybrid (yet to be developed!) might be preferred.
If only it could actually find primes.
Else, if seeking in only one frame (regardless of address) would be possible, this would bring up a new revolution in TPT storage and computers. :p
I am thinking that if address-seeking is implemented, it would take n number of frames before reaching the desired address, n being how far is the current address to the needed address.
this is what happens id:2204038
What if we will connect it to a display?