Pz.Kpfw. Tiger by 796
wip model,not really accurate, but i tried to. I will make some ammo for armor testing soon. Comment if you like it, maybe you can give an advice
justfordeco
tiger
german
ww2tank
tank
Comments
-
Beatless123 14th Feb 2021
Still both HE rounds were used only against infantry and light armored cars, they were too weak against tanks. Only HE with anti-tank capability were Soviet 122 and 152 mm. However, IS and ISU were overall weak due to extremely long reload. -
GlebRussia2 14th Feb 2021
Beatless123, American M62 APC round for M1 and soviet BR-365K AP for D-5T/S-53 had almost the same penetration. And 85mm HE round was more effictive that 76mm, latter was even inferior to 75mm HE for M3. -
scp-923 14th Feb 2021
let's be honest with ourselves the mark 4 is superior to all tankks any where any time -
EpsilonStudios 13th Feb 2021
ohh okay -
Umm 13th Feb 2021
Some of the other comments were deleted, were they still here they'd provide some context -
EpsilonStudios 13th Feb 2021beatless said that all ww2 heavy tanks had a problem with a breaking/low performance engine, and not just the tiger, how is he a wehraboo after saying that? he didn't say "all german ww2 tanks are superior", he was basically saying that each sides heavy tanks had performance issues
-
Beatless123 12th Feb 202176 mm Shermans had less armor and slower reverse than T-34-85 but had better penetration, faster reload and heavy machine gun.
-
DragonEggLol 12th Feb 2021
People be saying the Tiger had good performance dispite bad quality but then look at the T-34 and then say "but soviet engineering bad REEEEEEEEE" -
Umm 12th Feb 2021I am well aware of that, but hey, I don't have much else to do
-
Wasteland 12th Feb 2021
@Umm Your dealing with a wehraboo, logic doesnt apply to those types.