yes im the same person who made "equilibrium" its just this one is more polished and theoretically more stable ;)
satisfying
equilibrium
stable
press3
dynamic
Comments
-
No, Da_Doge, I'm phrasing "Opinions cannot be complete, nor can it be accurate, without deep thinking"
-
pacmanfan123: thats kinda rude and literally just rephrased " i hate opinions "
-
What dirtguy11211 said!
-
Guys, its falling dirt. Calm down, its not this deep.
-
This save is ment to be satisfying, not anything else.
-
Da_Doge, it's not bad to have opinions, it's just something that involves "think before you speak".
-
this is cool dont let anyone else say otherwise
-
SSA2012YT: so its bad to have opinions now? even newton was said to be unpleasant to be around, yet they still knew he was smart. you can define whats bad without taking the good.
-
Pretty much this exact system was studied in active matter physics, see arXiv:1707.09438 (numerics) and arXiv:1608.00094 (analytics)
-
It's an interesting driven-dissipative interacting dynamical system. The free theory has two stable steady states -- i) the low-density limit, where the ANAR and the DUST moving at equal and opposite constant speed, and ii) the high-density jammed limit where everything gets in the way. This save is a "jammed" limit, where transient crystals are stabilised by interactions.