kmann314
kmann314
33 / 4
18th November
18th November
yes im the same person who made "equilibrium" its just this one is more polished and theoretically more stable ;)
satisfying equilibrium stable press3 dynamic

Comments

  • pacmanfan123
    pacmanfan123
    27th November
    No, Da_Doge, I'm phrasing "Opinions cannot be complete, nor can it be accurate, without deep thinking"
  • Da_Doge
    Da_Doge
    24th November
    pacmanfan123: thats kinda rude and literally just rephrased " i hate opinions "
  • pacmanfan123
    pacmanfan123
    24th November
    What dirtguy11211 said!
  • dirtguy11211
    dirtguy11211
    24th November
    Guys, its falling dirt. Calm down, its not this deep.
  • pacmanfan123
    pacmanfan123
    24th November
    This save is ment to be satisfying, not anything else.
  • pacmanfan123
    pacmanfan123
    24th November
    Da_Doge, it's not bad to have opinions, it's just something that involves "think before you speak".
  • molteniron
    molteniron
    24th November
    this is cool dont let anyone else say otherwise
  • Da_Doge
    Da_Doge
    23rd November
    SSA2012YT: so its bad to have opinions now? even newton was said to be unpleasant to be around, yet they still knew he was smart. you can define whats bad without taking the good.
  • Isidor10
    Isidor10
    23rd November
    Pretty much this exact system was studied in active matter physics, see arXiv:1707.09438 (numerics) and arXiv:1608.00094 (analytics)
  • Isidor10
    Isidor10
    23rd November
    It's an interesting driven-dissipative interacting dynamical system. The free theory has two stable steady states -- i) the low-density limit, where the ANAR and the DUST moving at equal and opposite constant speed, and ii) the high-density jammed limit where everything gets in the way. This save is a "jammed" limit, where transient crystals are stabilised by interactions.