i wanted to make clear that i would not be responding furthur, not because i lost the argument, but because the argument had reached a point where it could no longer continue. i understand where you may have misunderstood my intention(i worded it poorly myself, but i could not think of the words at the time)
i made no personal attacks against you. I stated what you did. I am also content agreeing to disagreeing; however, the wording of your first comment was ambiguous to what your original point was.
@spiky_potato_viper Personal attacks are considered a logical fallacy, please stay on topic. Also, none of what you stated is actually happening, you seem to be talking out of spite. I don't want to be on bad terms with anyone, so if you are just going to be rude and not actually try to prove your point, then I would be perfectly fine with agreeing to disagree and moving on with my life.
your first comment is dancing around admitting that you were wrong. the subsequent comments are you making a new point so that it doesnt seem like you lost the arguement. you then phrase it in a way that makes it an opinion so that i can no longer argue with you.
What you have here is bassically just a fusion reactor with GBMB in it.
Again, I agree with you that this IS a reactor. But, I will not agree that is is an "Azure" reactor in the sense of it just having all the components of an Azurebomb.
@spiky_potato_viper According to the wikipedia, the term "Azure" refers to a blue color, and in middle English, Lapis Lazuli is the base word. The original creator of the Azurebomb (Ourus, or however the heck you spell his name) probably called it an "Azure" bomb because of the blue color that high-life GBMB creates when you veiw it in fancy display. Not because of the destructive nature.
the root etymology for "reactor" comes from the latin prefix "re", the verb "ago, agere, actus sum", and the suffix "itor". "re" meaning again, "agere" as in to do, and "itor" the one that does or place which it is done. together, it means "the place which things are repeatedly done." this definition has narrowed over time to only include closed vessels for reactions to take place. hence, any closed vessel where chemical or physical changes take place, is a reactor.
the 3rd merriam-webster definition for a reactor is "a vessel in which a chemical or some other type of reaction takes place"