self sufficient Azure reactor(no clne) by spiky_potato_viper

spiky_potato_viper

3 / 2

9th May

11th May

generates unlimited heat without fuel. it also does not contain any clne, conv, or any other of such means to duplicate particles. I challange anyone to make a system that can contain it and use it for power without any unbreakable materials.

Comments

• 

  spiky_potato_viper 12th May
  because there is no container/the container is very large, the long lasting detenation of the azure bomb would usually be called a "fallout".
• 

  spiky_potato_viper 12th May
  so yes, it can be considered a reactor. and last i checked, Azure modifies "bomb", i have no idea what the distinction "destruction bomb" means, because the purpose of most bombs is destruction. the destructive nature of an Azure bomb is inhereted from the "bomb" in its name. "Azure" describes the method the bomb uses to wreck destruction.
• 

  spiky_potato_viper 12th May
  yes, it does mostly meet the definition of a reactor. the only other requirement is "contained". which yours technically is as there is wall at the edge of the screen.
• 

  dirtguy11211 12th May
  So, you're saying that because this lasts a long time, it is a reactor? does that mean that since id:3340884 lasts a long time, it is a reactor? not at all! Sure, you can throw the same components of an Azure into a circle of daimond and call it a reactor. but, the term "Azure" cannot be used to describe it, because it does not fullfill the purpose of the term "Azure"!
• 

  spiky_potato_viper 11th May
  not only that, there is no requirement that the reaction has to be in contact with any vessel. similar to fusion reactors(there are fusion reactors on earth, they have just yet to reach a phase where they can generate a significant amount more power than they consume and generate enough excess energy to offset the cost of building them) on earth, one could try to use some system to suspend the reaction and collect the radiation/ambient heat to use for power.
• 

  spiky_potato_viper 11th May
  also, there are many layered conv and bcln alloys that can survive warp. ultimately, the challange here, is to create an alloy that can not only do that, but also does not deplete the reaction by converting reactants into something else.
• 

  spiky_potato_viper 11th May
  the definition of a "bomb" is to destroy things. if you remove the "bomb" part of "azure bomb", what do you have left? your arguement is literally "you cant have a nuclear reactor because a nuke is supposed to destroy things!". the difference between a reactor and a bomb is how quickly the expolsion happens. because this explosion lasts for a long time, it is ultimately correct to call this a "reactor".
• 

  TheDarkLord 10th May
  Damn this got fp because of how much negative attention it's got
• 

  dirtguy11211 10th May
  The point of the Azure mechanism is to destroy things.... not to be used as a power source. The literal definition of an "Azure" is to use specific elements to ennihialate objects.
• 

  dirtguy11211 10th May
  I would still not clasify this as any sort of Azure mechanism. It has all the components, but it doesn't fullfill the purpose as stated in id:1265346. Btw, that is the very first Azurebomb.