The Powder Toy

ThunderSt

@ivel236 (View Post)

Because it would require much more precision in heating and cooling, which would be annoying.

Also:

BudCharles:

@ivel236 (View Post)

Fear of breaking saves probably.

@Poorsoft (View Post)

OFC it works well.. portals have channels nowadays..

ivel236

BTw its not that hard to heat wifi. And most people just use prop anyway. But scratch what i said before, 10 by 10 spaced wifi's is a crap idea...

THough i think the ctype thing is a very good idea.

Poorsoft

Ah, but the thing I found is that the portal-in "swallows" the spark, unlike WIFI.

924178View Save 924178

New-IdeasForYou

I suggested wifi temp 0~9700 for tmp1, tpm2, tpm3 etc.

so we would have MUCH more channels. I agree we need it.

ThunderSt

@Poorsoft (View Post)

I was thinking another thing.. I didn't know that portals actually transfer sprk.. and that's supposed to happen. Metal lines and metal lines with sprk jumping gaps have the same speed.. it's like those gaps had metal in them.

Shriek

This post is hidden because the user is banned

nmd

@Poorsoft (View Post)

That can easily be worked around

Poorsoft

@Shriek (View Post)

Portals have exceptions though, as you can see. WIFI acts more as a signal, where portals, like @ThunderSt said, "swallow" up the metal itself in a way. It also cuts off the circuit, if you get what I mean. You have to add more wires around it to carry on.

Wifi + 10000 Temp