INSL change suggestion

  • Raphi
    29th Jun 2012 Member 1 Permalink

    Sometimes I need an insulator for electronics and ARAY should also shoot a BRAY through the insulator.

    INSL is the only insulator, but no BRAY can pass through it.

    What about if INSL's tmp is 1, BRAY can pass through it?

     

    Older saves would not be affected, because most (or all) have INSL with tmp=0.

     

    I think this would just be a minor code change in ARAY.c.

  • boxmein
    29th Jun 2012 Former Staff 0 Permalink
    @Raphi (View Post)
    Maybe.
    >edit:
    tmp was suggested in another suggestion to be the base of BRAY life determination, but tmp2 might work?
    @grandmaster!below
    It'd be way more efficient on the aray side.

  • Raphi
    2nd Jul 2012 Member 0 Permalink

    @boxmein (View Post)

    Or just use life value.

    Can anyone of the devs make this, please?

  • grandmaster
    2nd Jul 2012 Member 0 Permalink

    @boxmein (View Post)

    uhh what it's suggested on the way  that insulators tmp is changed in order to get that so your argument is invalid

  • baizuo
    3rd Jul 2012 Member 0 Permalink

    @grandmaster (View Post)

    Sounds good, then you can make circuits that are fully protected/isolated by INSL, the BRAY is the only way to communicate.

  • grandmaster
    3rd Jul 2012 Member 0 Permalink

    @baizuo (View Post)

    True allowing for some awesome electronics

  • Raphi
    4th Jul 2012 Member 0 Permalink

    Will that get implemented sometime or not?

  • plead-for-destruction
    4th Jul 2012 Member 0 Permalink
    @Raphi (View Post)
    it might but the devs have the final decision ;)
  • Raphi
    4th Jul 2012 Member 0 Permalink

    @plead-for-destruction (View Post)

     

    I know, but it would be good to know if is is rejected or not....