Splitting layered FILT

  • QuanTech
    30th Apr 2017 Member 0 Permalink

    Hello. I'm looking for a way to take a pixel of layered FILT and split it into its constituent pixels, in 1 frame (subframe). Any ideas? Thnx.

  • LBPHacker
    30th Apr 2017 Developer 0 Permalink

     

    Beware though that basically nothing can interact with stacks. Everything sees only the top particle. E.g. you can't move this stack around, nor can you copy the whole stack at once.

    Edited once by LBPHacker. Last: 30th Apr 2017
  • QuanTech
    30th Apr 2017 Member 0 Permalink

    @LBPHacker (View Post)

     It doesn't seem to work for stacks with more than 2 pixels... Sorry I didn't specify that in the first post.

    Edited 3 times by QuanTech. Last: 30th Apr 2017
  • LBPHacker
    30th Apr 2017 Developer 0 Permalink

    Do it with pistons then. Save updated. The way it is now it doesn't split the stack in a single frame, but that can easily be implemented. Lol I was wrong.

    Edited 2 times by LBPHacker. Last: 30th Apr 2017
  • QuanTech
    30th Apr 2017 Member 0 Permalink

    @LBPHacker (View Post)

     But it doesn't split it onto all its pieces in 1 frame, it does 1 piece per frame

  • LBPHacker
    30th Apr 2017 Developer 0 Permalink

    Just how big is your stack?

  • jacob1
    30th Apr 2017 Developer 0 Permalink
    Is it even possible to split a stack in one frame? As LBPHacker said, TPT can't know what is beneath a stack. It only knows what is on top. So you could split one particle off per frame, but you can't do any more than that. TPT wouldn't recalculate pmap to see what is on top again until the next frame.
  • LBPHacker
    30th Apr 2017 Developer 0 Permalink

    Oh lol right. pmap updates. Yeah, apparently it's impossible to split up a stack with more than 2 particles. Good to know. Save updated, the second splitter fails.

  • QuanTech
    30th Apr 2017 Member 0 Permalink

    So is it possible to split a particle in the middle of the stack away from the others without having to take off everything on top?

  • LBPHacker
    30th Apr 2017 Developer 0 Permalink

    No, ^. In other words, virtually only the particle on the top exists, from the point of view of other particles.

    Edited once by LBPHacker. Last: 30th Apr 2017