new group for new users

  • girr
    8th Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    it will be called ngage

    it will be about new users learning and makingg better creations. send in any creation to enter and pm me if you want to be a partial owner
  • toyou1995
    8th Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    *headdesk* Its called the Brotherhood of Saves doofus read its description..... (Mods please lock this thread)
  • girr
    8th Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    the brotherhood of saves is too serious. and there can be more than two groups.

    edit: "Purpose for thread:
    Recruiting and general chat."

    the purpose of this is to make new users better
  • toyou1995
    8th Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    Its not too serious it just wants to make sure you are not someone who will clog up TPT with junk....Also more than 2 makes things confusing for most people nevermind the several 10 that already exist (If people want to learn there is a Help topic and a school of PT).
  • roguegeneral--
    8th Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @toyou1995 (View Post)
    you broke a rule by telling the mods to lock a thread thats not yours
  • toyou1995
    8th Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    I was only suggesting it since this is entirely pointless, anyway isnt an ngage a type of phone?
  • aaronhance007
    8th Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    toyou broke rules he requested for thred to be locked

    toyou1995:

    *headdesk* Its called the Brotherhood of Saves doofus read its description..... (Mods please lock this thread)

    look in rules before posting
  • girr
    8th Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    i dont know, i name it that because its what i want the group to be about

    and breaking the rules is not cool
  • roguegeneral--
    8th Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    congrats on your "helping the little guy mentality" I give you an Empire blessing
  • toyou1995
    8th Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @aaronhance007 (View Post) While I do send my dearest apologies to everyone on the forum for my absence of of logic on that matter, my point still remains as made in the previous post.