MOVEABLE SOLIDS

  • smurf
    8th Jul 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    why is everybody raging bout it?? what would it be useful for?? and wouldn't it just fall off the screen?

    i like my solids still thanks
  • TheWiseEyes
    8th Jul 2011 Banned 0 Permalink
    This post is hidden because the user is banned
  • MasterMind555
    8th Jul 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @smurf (View Post)
    Because it's in Dan's Balls
  • cctvdude99
    8th Jul 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @smurf
    ... Don't make a thread about it. Also, it's 'movable' not 'moveable'.

    It would be useful for stuff. Think about real life, your stuff moves around according to air pressure and velocity, and gravity.


    Also, flaaaaaaaaaaammmmeee wwwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrr has begun.
    Edited by cctvdude99, 2011-07-06 18:09:10
  • Ozonerx
    8th Jul 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    And coding would be really painfull...
  • nmd
    8th Jul 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    Please, TPT cannot have movible solida because it's very hard to code.
    (also I wouldn't have done that, you just turned every sane menber of the forums againced you :P at least for now.)

    Por favor, TPT no puede tener solida movible, ya que es muy difícil de codificar.
    (también yo no habría hecho eso, usted acaba de cumplir todos los menber sano de los foros againced que :P al menos por ahora)

    S'il vous plaît, TPT ne peut pas avoir SOLIDA movible parce qu'il est très difficile de code.
    (aussi je n'aurais pas fait cela, vous venez d'allumer tous les menber saine des forums, vous againced:. P moins pour l'instant)

    Tanpri, TPT pa ka gen movible solida paske li an difisil anpil postal.
    (tou mwen pa ta gen fè sa, ou jis vire chak menber lisid nan fowòm yo againced ou :P omwen pou kounye a.)
    Edited by nmd, 2011-07-06 18:39:15
  • Catelite
    8th Jul 2011 Former Staff 0 Permalink
    I was talking to Skylark about it, he said it would be possible, but basically it's a couple of logic pretzels figuring out how to make it interact with fixed particles (the cellular automata that TPT is basically) without either destroying everything or lagging horribly.

    He -did- say however, making moving solids that do not rotate would be very easy, except for the obvious caveat that they would make producing solids that can't tip over possible, and that coding it that way would make it more difficult to fix them to rotate later.
  • Neospector
    8th Jul 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @Catelite (View Post)
    Screw rotation, people can live with bombs that just drop and not bounce.
  • nmd
    8th Jul 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    omg, why don't you just do that? it would satisfy n00bs (cough, smurf, cough) and it would really just change the game?
    besides, who would want it to rotate anyways?
  • lolzy
    8th Jul 2011 Former Staff 0 Permalink
    Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait... If someone suggests it, you all rage. But if someone slams it, you all rage? Um. Not sure if troll...
Locked by Catelite: locklocklock